Compare
Lomen vs DataFast
Both put your revenue next to your traffic. They answer different questions, and this page says which one answers yours.
DataFast is built around revenue attribution: it ties payments to the channels and visitors that brought them, with goals, funnels and journeys on top. Lomen is calmer and narrower: cookie-free counting, AI that explains what changed in plain words, and your income on the same chart as your visitors.
- Lomen is the better pick
- 3
- About even
- 2
- DataFast is the better pick
- 1
Visitors and income · last 30 days
Lomen AI
Sample answerWhy did I earn more last weekend?
Saturday had fewer visitors than your weekdays, but it was your best sales day of the month. Fewer people came, but more of them bought, so the quiet day on your traffic chart was not a quiet day for your income.
Written from the demo site's sample data. On your account it reads your own figures.
Compare Lomen alongside DataFast
- 1. Keep your DataFast setup as it is.
- 2. Add Lomen's one-line script beside it. Both count independently.
- 3. Compare for a week or two, then keep whichever answers your questions.
DataFast details come from datafa.st as of October 2026. "Not listed" means we could not find it there, not that it is missing. Prices and features change; if something here is out of date, write to micromacka@outlook.com and we will correct it.
Choose Lomen if
- You want to know what changed and why, in a sentence, without building a report
- You want income on the same chart as visitors without setting up goals
- You want to try it for free while it is in beta
Choose DataFast if
- You need to know exactly which channel brought each paying customer
- You run funnels, goals and visitor journeys
- You compare ad spend against the revenue it brought
- You want a tool many other founders already use
See it on your own traffic
One script tag, about two minutes, free while Lomen is in beta. Or look around the live demo first.